July 20, 2022

Team Profile:
Numerical geochemical modelling of basalt-water interaction under subcritical conditions
contributor(s)

Eylem Kaya

photo credit:

Members of our GNG team recently co-authored a paper published in the Geothermics journal.

Altar, D.E., Kaya, E.,  Zarrouk, S.J., Passarella, M., Mountain, B.W. Numerical geochemical modelling of basalt-water interaction under subcritical conditions, Geothermics, 105, 102520 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2022.102520 

Reactive transport models are vital tools for understanding geothermal reservoir processes. They provide information on subsurface mineral alterations (dissolution and deposition), geothermal fluid chemistry evolution, dissolved gas content, and reservoir porosity and permeability distributions. In this paper, the authors undertook reactive transport modelling of a high pressure and temperature laboratory experiment that simulated the reaction between unaltered tholeiitic basalt and distilled water under subcritical conditions (350 °C and 490 bar). 

This modelling study was used to develop methodologies for building reactive transport models in TOUGHREACT™ with a particular focus on the parameters for reaction thermodynamics and kinetics at high temperature and pressure conditions. Equilibrium constants for mineral and aqueous reactions were estimated using SUPCRTBL (Zimmer et al., 2016). Mineral dissolution rates were primarily adopted from Palandri and Kharaka (2004), while precipitation rates were estimated following the work of Horiuti (1957).

The validation and update of geochemical assumptions are also integral to the methodology. Published reaction rates were verified against experimental results (using the effluent chemistry and mineralogy data) to supplement the currently available information for mineral reactions at the experiment temperature and pressure. Justifications for the modelling decisions made as well as uncertainties are presented. The methodology can be adapted for use with similar high temperature and pressure environments, including supercritical water conditions.

Experimental concentration data versus modelled values for Na+, K+, H4SiO4,aq and H2Saq. (Altar et al, 2022)
Observed locations of bytownite alteration (red markers) to anorthite (green markers) versus model results. End-member molar fractions for plagioclase and its abundance across the reactor at the end of the modelled period are shown. (a) Anorthite mole fraction. (b) Albite mole fraction. (c) Plagioclase abundance by volume fraction. (Altar et al, 2022)

A satisfactory agreement was achieved between the experiment results and the numerical model. The calibrated reactive transport model sufficiently captured the mineral reaction kinetics and the interactions of the concurrent dissolution and precipitation processes in the experiment. The model is expected to provide realistic predictions of further interactions between distilled water and basalt at 350 °C and 490 bar if the experiment was run for a more extended period.

References

Horiuti, J., 1957. 35 A Theorem on the Relation between Rate Constants and Equilibrium Constant. In: Proceedings, International Congress on Catalysis. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, pp. 339-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-0564(08)60183-2

Palandri, J.L., Kharaka, Y.K., 2004.A Compilation of Rate Parameters of Water-Mineral Interaction Kinetics for Application to Geochemical Modeling. U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California. Accessed from: https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2004/1068/

Zimmer, K., Zhang, Y., Lu, P., Chen,Y., Zhang, G., Dalkilic, M., Zhu, C., 2016. SUPCRTBL: A revised and extended thermodynamic dataset and software package of SUPCRT92. Comput. Geosci. 90(Part A), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2016.02.013

read more

categories

Geochemistry
Modelling
Science
Engineering

tags

new publication
experimental geochemistry
numerical modelling
reservoir modelling
reservoir
geochemistry

Further Updates

October 15, 2020

Team Profile:

The Legend of Ngātoroirangi
September 25, 2020

Team Profile:

Who are GNG’s Research Stakeholders?